E-ISSN: 2619-9467

Contents    Cover    Publication Date: 24 Dec 2020
Year 2020 - Volume 30 - Issue 4

Open Access

Peer Reviewed

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
760 Viewed598 Downloaded

A Prospective Analysis of Sexual Behaviors of Pregnant Women in Southeast Turkey

  
J Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;30(4):131-5
DOI: 10.5336/jcog.2020-76300
Article Language: EN
Copyright Ⓒ 2020 by Türkiye Klinikleri. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this cross-sectional survey study was to prospectively evaluate the changes in sexual behaviours of pregnant women in Southeast Turkey which is under different pressures, either culturally or religiously according to the other regions of Turkey. Material and Methods: Three hundred pregnant women completed a 25-question survey about their sexual life. The questions were prepared based on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Body Exposure during Sexual Activities Questionnaire (BESAQ) tests. Results: Sexual desire decreased in 65.2% of women (n=163) and increased in 8.4% (n=21). The rate of orgasms was 55.6% (n=139), and higher during anal intercourse (p=0.038). The orgasm rate before and during pregnancy was similar (p=0.72). The orgasm/satisfaction was higher during anal intercourse compared to that during vaginal intercourse (p=0.038). Sixty five percent of the women were worried about coitus during pregnancy (n=176). However, 85.7% of the pregnant women (n=257) had regular sexual intercourse to maintain a healthy partnership (40%) or for desire (23%). There was no significant relationship between intercourse frequency and education level (p=0.81), abortion history (p=0.63), age (p=0.21), and gestational week (p=0.81). Sexual desire remained mostly unchanged in women following their first, second, and third births (61.1%, 61.7%, and 69.8%, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that despite the geographical, cultural and social differences between the southeast region and other regions, the fact that sexual life during pregnancy has similar characteristics for every women shows that sexual physiology is independent from external factors.
REFERENCES:
  1. Babazadeh R, Najmabadi KM, Masomi Z. Changes in sexual desire and activity during pregnancy among women in Shahroud, Iran. Int J Gyanecol Obstet. 2013;120(1):82-4.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  2. Küçükdurmaz F, Efe E, Malkoç Ö, Kolus E, Amasyalı AS, Resim S. Prevalence and correlates of female sexual dysfunction among Turkish pregnant women. Turk J Urol. 2016;42(3):178-83.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 
  3. Ribeiro MC, de Tubino Scanavino M, do Amaral MLS, de Moraes Horta AL, Torloni MR. Beliefs about sexual activity during pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;43(8):822-32.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  4. Arousell J, Carlbom A. Culture and religious beliefs in relation to reproductive health. Best Pract Res Clin. Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;32:77-87.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  5. Jamali S, Mosalanejad L. Sexual dysfunction in Iranian pregnant women. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(6):479-86.[PubMed] 
  6. Staruch M, Kucharczyk A, Zawadzka K, Wielgos M, Szymusik I. Sexual activity during pregnancy. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2016;37(1):53-8[PubMed] 
  7. Corbacioglu A, Bakir VL, Akbayir O, Cilesiz Goksedef BP, Akca A. The role of pregnancy awareness on female sexual function in early gestation. J Sex Med. 2012;9(7):1897-903.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  8. Kisa S, Zeyneloğlu S, Yilmaz D, Güner T. Quality of sexual life and its effect on marital adjustment of Turkish women in pregnancy. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(4):309-22.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  9. Yanikkerem E, Goker A, Ustgorul S, Karakus A. Evaluation of sexual functions and marital adjustment of pregnant women in Turkey. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28(5):176-83.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  10. Costa E. Social media in Southeast Turkey: Love, kinship and politics. UCL Press; 2016.[Link] 
  11. Puri KS, Suresh KR, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Declaration of Helsinki, 2008: implications for stakeholders in research. J Postgrad Med. 2009;55(2):131-4.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  12. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191-208.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  13. Cash TF, Maikkula CL, Yamamiya Y. Baring the body in the bedroom: Body image, sexual self-schemas, and sexual functioning among college women and men. Electron J Hum Sex. 2004;7:1-9.[Link] 
  14. Ninivaggio C, Rogers RG, Leeman L, Migliaccio L, Teaf D, Qualls C. Sexual function changes during pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(6):923-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  15. Akyuz MD, Turfan EC, Oner SC, Sakar T, Aktay DM. Sexual functions in pregnancy: different situations in near geography: a case study on Turkey, Iran and Greece. J Matern-Fetal Neo M. 2020;33(2):222-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  16. Erbil N. Sexual function of pregnant women in the third trimester. Alexandria Med J. 2018;54(2):139-42.[Crossref] 
  17. Aslan G, Aslan D, Kizilyar A, Ispahi C, Esen A. A prospective analysis of sexual functions during pregnancy. Int J Import Res. 2005;17(2):154-7.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  18. Erenel AS, Eroglu K, Vural G, Dilbaz B. A pilot study: in what ways do women in Turkey experience a change in their sexuality during pregnancy? Sex Disabil. 2011;29(3):207-16.[Crossref] 
  19. Vannier SA, Rosen NO. Sexual distress and sexual problems during pregnancy: associations with sexual and relationship satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2017;14(3):387-95.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  20. Yıldız H. The relation between prepregnancy sexuality and sexual function during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a prospective study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(1):49-59.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  21. Senkumwong N, Chaovisitsaree S, Rugpao S, Chandrawongse W, Yanunto S. The changes of sexuality in Thai women during pregnancy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(suppl 4):124-9[PubMed] 
  22. Jawed Wessel S, Santo J, Irwin J. Sexual activity and attitudes as predictors of sexual satisfaction during pregnancy: A multi-level model describing the sexuality of couples in the first 12 weeks. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48(3):843-54.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  23. Jawed-Wessel S, Sevick E. The impact of pregnancy and childbirth on sexual behaviors: a systematic review. J Sex Res. 2017;54(4-5):411-23.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  24. Sassine D, Ghulmiyyah L, Atallah S, Ghieh D, Saleh N, Slim S, et al. Sexual Changes During Pregnancy in a Middle-Eastern Population. Sex Cult. 2020;24(3):1232-51.[Crossref] 
  25. Livingstone JD, Ralte L, Magar JT, Chaudhuri S, Cherian AG, Mohan VR. Sexual behaviour in pregnancy among antenatal women attending a secondary hospital in southern India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(8):3501.[Crossref] 
  26. Gündüz Hosgör Ayse, JPJM Smits. The status of rural women in Turkey: What is the role of regional differences. NiCE. 2006.[Link] 
  27. Harris Leila M. Modernizing the nation: Postcolonialism, postdevelopmentalism, and ambivalent spaces of difference in southeastern Turkey. Geoforum. 2008;39(5):1698-708.[Crossref]